website marketing web site marketing
internet marketing search engine marketing seo marketing search engine alt tags web site optimization web site seo
Home
Download
About SpiderLoop
Resell SpiderLoop
Support
SpiderLoop WIKI
Test Drive SpiderLoop
Windows Hosting
SpiderLoop BLOG
SpiderLoop SEO Forums





Welcome to SpiderLoop web marketing.
You found a page created by the SpiderLoop SEO Control Panel:

optimize my web site for google


You can download the SpiderLoop SEO control panel for free for your own web site.
Use the navigation above or click here to find out how.



TextLinks.com
Link Partners 2


TextLinks.com


Would you like to see
your RSS feed here?
Feeds.SpiderLoop.com
Link Partners

optimize my web site for google

optimize my web site for google Search Produced 25 Matching Articles
The Basics of Blogging and Web Site Creation - Part One: Content Is King
My fellow writers at the Absolute Writers Forum (known lovingly as the AW Water Cooler or just Cooler) are the reason for these next series of articles so I wish to thank them.
Full Article
A Guide For Choosing The Best Web Site Hosting Service
There are a million of options available with the few thousands of hosting companies that exist today and that makes choice all the more difficult, or let's say, confusing. Fact remains that people often tend to overlook a few simple facts that not only h
Full Article
How search engine marketing tools can work for you: or, searching is really all about finding
How search engine marketing tools can work for you: or, searching is really all about finding
Information Outlook

Summary

This is the second of three articles. Part 1 appeared in the August issue of Information Outlook.

Search engine optimization and marketing covers a wide range of activities, many of which are similar to what a reference librarian, systems librarian, or market researcher does. Although the focus is the World Wide Web, many of the tools that are used have broader applications for special librarians.

Internal corporate processes. Web analytics tools measure and analyze corporate sales, customer preferences and problems, viable products and channels, and other issues that may provide answers for questions received by special librarians.

Competitive intelligence/market research. Keyword research, Web site saturation and popularity tools can provide information on a company's competitors: how they are marketing on the Internet, what they are spending on online marketing campaigns, how they are pricing their products.

Legal issues. Who Is tools can provide valuable information relating to copyright and trademark issues. Link Popularity tools can show who is deep-linking to your site. Log files, in conjunction with Who Is tools, can tell you who may be committing click fraud on your paid placement campaigns or spamming your e-mail servers.

Back end knowledge of how Web sites work. These tools can show you what may be keeping search engines from indexing your site and can highlight customer service issues.

Continue article
Advertisement


SECOND OF THREE ARTICLES

Web site saturation and popularity tools show how much presence a Web site has on search engines through the number of pages of the site that are indexed on each search engine (saturation) and how many times the site is linked to by other sites (popularity).

If your company wants to generate leads from Web site traffic, you need to understand your organization's Web presence, particularly in relation to that of your competitors. Generally, the more Web presence you have, the easier it is for people to find your site; that is, if those pages contain the keywords people are looking for and if they rank high enough in search engine rankings for people to see them. Most search engines include some form of link popularity in their ranking algorithms. Pay attention to this so you can learn the number of sites that are linking to yours, which is very important. Knowing where your site stands in these two areas can give you a good idea of what you need to do to improve your Web presence.

Many tools measure various aspects of saturation and link popularity. My favorites are Link Popularity +, Top 10 Google Analysis, and Marketleap's Link Popularity and Search Engine Saturation.

Link Popularity + (http://www.uptimebot.com) shows much more than its name implies. It measures the number of back-links (incoming external links to your site); linked domains (all pages that link to any page in your domain, including internal pages); pages of your site that are indexed; and pages that contain your URL in the Google, Yahoo, AlltheWeb, AltaVista, Hotbot, MSN, Teoma, Lycos, AOL, and Alexa search databases. (See Figure 1.)

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Once you register (it's free), you can also see overall Google page rank, the number of pages you have at each Google page rank, and whether your site is listed in the DMOZ Open Directory, one of the major search directories. Page rank is one indicator of a page's popularity and authority. Registration lets you do mass reviews of up to 16 domains and have the results e-mailed to you. (See Figure 2.)

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

This has become one of my favorite tools, because it provides one of the most comprehensive snapshots of Web presence as far as the number of search engines it covers and the type of information it shows. The one area it doesn't cover is competitor comparisons. When I need to do a competitor comparison, I use the Top 10 Google Analysis and Marketleap tools.

Top 10 Google Analysis (www.Webuildpages.com/tools/internet-marketing-google.htm) provides the top 10 search results for a keyword on Google, along with the ranking of the base URL. This makes it a great competitive intelligence tool. (See Figure 3.)

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

The results also show the number of pages indexed by Google and Yahoo; the number of backlinks for the reference URL and for the domain as a whole from Yahoo, Google PageRank, Yahoo Web Rank, and AllInAnchor (query words in anchor text of links pointing to the site); body keyword density (ratio of keywords to total words); and link keyword density (ratio of keywords in links to all links).

This tool is a good indicator of the overall standings of your competition on the two major search engines and provides information about what gives them their rankings (keyword density, number of links to the site, number of links with keywords to the site, number of pages indexed, and page ranks). By analyzing the key characteristics of the top 10 sites for a keyword, you can get a good idea of what it takes for the term to rank well. (See Figure 4.)

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

To use this tool, you need to have a Google API code, available free from Google (www.google.com/apis). The API code lets you run a limited number of specialized searches on Google.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Marketleap offers a suite of free SEM tools, including the Search Engine Saturation Validator, the Link Popularity Analysis, and the Keyword Verification Tool. (See Figure 5.)

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

The Search Engine Saturation Validator (www.marketleap.com/siteindex/default.htm) shows the number of pages that several top search engines have in their databases for your Web site and the sites of up to five competitors. The search engines covered are AlltheWeb, AltaVista, Google/AOL, Hotbot, MSN, and Yahoo. I use this tool primarily to see how the site I'm optimizing compares with specific competitors on the number of pages indexed by the search engines. In general, the more pages a site has indexed, the greater the opportunity to be found by searchers. (See Figure 6.)

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

What I like most about the Link Popularity Analysis (www.marketleap.com/publinkpop) is its ability to choose competitors with whom to compare link popularity, along with the ability to see the link popularity for 25 other Web sites in a company's industry category. If your company's industry isn't included, you can choose General, which shows the link popularity for 25 companies across a number of industries. What you get back is how your site compares with others in your industry on link popularity on the AlltheWeb, AltaVista, Google/AOL, Hotbot, MSN, and Yahoo search engines. (See Figure 7.)

The tool shows your presence on the Web in terms of number of pages in each search engine's index that contain a link to your site, including your own Web site. Another valuable component of this tool is that it gives you an idea of whether your link numbers make your company a major player on the Web:

* Limited presence: 0-1,000 references.

* Average presence: 1,001-5,000 references.

* Above-average presence: 5,001-20,000 references.

* Contender: 20,001-100,000 references.

* Player: 100,001-500,000 references.

* 900-pound gorilla: 500,000+ references. (See Figure 8.)

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

Needless to say, there are very few 900-pound gorillas. In some niche industries, there may not be any sites that come close to having this many total "references" across all the major search engines. (Note: "Total" data are inflated, because they include the total of all links for the six search engines, which means many duplicates. Nevertheless, the total is a good relative indicator of what it takes to be a top site.) The General Industry category lists 14 gorilla sites; the top five are listed in Figure 9.

[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]

By looking at the sites linking to your site, you can get an idea of the volume and quality of pages linking to you and who may be referring traffic to you. Once you know who is linking to you and the part of your site they are linking to, you can examine the areas of your site that are performing well and those that aren't. By checking out competitors who are outperforming your site, you can see who is linking to them and figure out what you need to do to improve your visibility. (See Figure 10.)

[FIGURE 11 OMITTED]

Marketleap's Keyword Verification Tool (www.marketleap.com/verify/default.htm) provides a quick way to see if your site ranks in the top 30 keywords through keyword verification. Many studies have shown that the vast majority of people don't look beyond the first 30 search results. You may have numerous pages indexed with plenty of links pointing to your site, but if you're not ranked in the top 30 on keywords that people use to search for your products and services, you're not visible. The Keyword Verification Tool covers AlltheWeb, AltaVista, AOL, Google/AOL, Lycos Pro, Hotbot, MSN, Netscape, and Yahoo. (See Figure 11.)

Thumbshots (http://ranking.thumbshots.com) lets you compare the top 100 results for a term on two different search engines or compare two different terms on the same search engine. You can highlight a particular site to see where the site ranks on both search engines. (See Figure 12.)

[FIGURE 13 OMITTED]

The output is visual, with lines connecting pages that rank in the top 100 on both search engines or keywords. Pages from your site are in red, and those of other sites that have pages on both sides are in blue. Hover your mouse over any of the hundred circles and see the URL, rank, and, if available, a thumbnail image of the page. The text output includes the number of overlapping links and number of unique links. (See Figure 13.)

[FIGURE 14 OMITTED]

The comparisons also show how little duplication there is on the Web--there are usually very few connecting lines between search engines. In a search on "retail displays," only 15 pages ranked in the top 100 on both Google and Yahoo.

[FIGURE 15 OMITTED]

I like this tool because it shows you where your site is ranked along a 100-dot line for a phrase on two search engines or how it ranks for two different phrases on one search engine. I use it more for seeing how two different terms rank on the same search engine than for search engine comparison, as there are other tools to do that. I've used it most often for demonstrating to clients the success of using one phrase over another in their site's content. (See Figure 14.)

Link Desirability

The next two tools are designed to help you determine the "desirability" of having another site link to yours. Not all links are created equal--some can even hurt your search engine rankings. Generally, a popular site that contains a few relevant links will be a better site to seek a link from than a "link farm" site that is nothing more than a collection of links. Although Google's PageRank is considered to be an important indicator of the link popularity of a site, I don't give it much weight when I'm looking for a site from which to request a link. Instead, I look at whether the site is a good fit for the one I'm marketing, and whether a link on that site would benefit both sites. (See Figure 15.)

[FIGURE 16 OMITTED]

One tool, Link Appeal by Webmaster Toolkit (www.Webmaster-toolkit.com/link-appeal.shtml), calculates the desirability rating of a link on the URL you specify. The calculation includes factors such as page rank, number of outbound links, and overall percentage of links to HTML. It is intended as a guideline for evaluating whether you should ask for a link on a certain page or not. (See Figure 16.)

[FIGURE 17 OMITTED]

The Class C Checker (www.Webmaster-toolkit.com/class-c-checker.shtml) allows you to check whether two domains are hosted on the same Class C IP range. Links from sites that are not on the same range as your site are thought to give more weight. (See Figure 17.)

[FIGURE 18 OMITTED]

Search engines don't like duplication in search results, so having a different IP address can help separate sites that are located on the same servers and may share databases or programming elements. Because EBSCO hosts many sites, I use Class C Checker more for the latter purpose than for link popularity. (See Figure 18.)

[FIGURE 19 OMITTED]

Other Ranking Tools

While the following tools aren't strictly SEM tools, I find them very valuable in my work.

The main Google search engine doesn't number results, which can make it difficult to figure out where you rank on a particular term. But Google Results (www.google.com/ie?q=&num=100&hl=en) gives numbered results. A disadvantage is that it only shows title and URL information, so identifying your site among the results can be difficult (unless your site name is in the title). I generally do a search on the main Google search engine and use the browser's Find option to see if my site's URL is in the top 30 or 100 results. If it is, I make a note of the title, then go to Google Results and redo the search. I check to see my site's numbered ranking. This is a lot easier than trying to physically count search results on a screen. (See Figures 19 and 20.)

Google Dance (www.google-dance-tool.com) has two uses. The first shows how you rank on the various Google servers; the second presents numbered results. I use this tool primarily for numbered results, unless I've discovered that I'm getting vastly different rankings when I search on a term within a short period of time. (See Figure 21.)

[FIGURE 20 OMITTED]

Froogle (www.froogle.com) is Google's shopping search engine. It allows companies to add their products to the site free of charge. I use Froogle in two ways: to expand a site's listings on the Internet and to illustrate price comparisons. Because Froogle is free, it is the simplest way for an e-commerce company to get all its products listed online. And because Froogle results sometimes appear at the top of Google results, it's a good way to get a site to show high in rankings if it doesn't do so organically. Currently, Google is generally not allowing new sites into top-ranked positions for at least six months after launch. (See Figure 22.)

[FIGURE 21 OMITTED]

Froogle is valuable in price comparisons because it helps me understand where my clients' pricing is compared with that of their competitors. You can do price comparisons on the other shopping search engines, but the only Web sites you find on those are companies that pay to be on them. All our e-commerce clients who meet the requirements for Froogle are added to it when ESWS redesigns a Web site. (See Figure 23.)

[FIGURE 22 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 23 OMITTED]

Figure 9

Marketleap Top 5 Most-Linked-To Web Sites

Most-Linked-To Web Sites Number of Links

Yahoo.com 51,624,212
Mp3.com 26,652,540
Amazon.com 24,213,964
Microsoft.com 18,340,881
CNN.com 10,777,438
RELATED ARTICLE: How to use keyword saturation and popularity tools

1. Top 10 Google Analysis, and Marketleap's Search Engine Saturation and Link Popularity can help you identify some of your online competitors and determine how you compare in the terms you use to describe your products and services.

2. If you get a question about why your company Web site isn't performing as well as a competitor's site in search engine rankings, the Link Popularity +, Top 10 Google Analysis, and Search Engine Saturation tools can illustrate why--or show why your site is doing well.

3. Librarians often spend a lot of time explaining to people why it is important to use more than one search engine in doing research. Thumbshot is a good tool to graphically show the lack of duplication in search results.

4. The Google Dance tool is good to know about if two searches for the same phrase return different results. Use it to see if Google is in the midst of updating its index.

5. Use Google Results or Google Dance for a concise list of numbered search results.

6. Froogle and the other shopping search engines are an easy and effective way to find out what your competitors are charging for your type of product and how your pricing compares. Because Froogle is a free service, it has a broader range of companies to compare with. However, Froogle also has a smaller percentage of visitors, so it may not be representative of all shopping visitors.
Full Article
10 Simple Steps to Optimize Your Retail Web Site
Optimize your web site to decrease page load time and attract more customers.
Full Article
Wikimedia Foundation Gets $300K for Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Foundation Gets $300K for Wikimedia Commons

The Ford Foundation has just granted $300,000 to the Wikimedia Foundation to support Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia's repository for free, sharable multimedia files.

The grant will fund a study of barriers to entry for users and contributors new to Wikimedia Commons. The project team will also identify best practices from similar media-sharing sites. The team will design and implement a simpler workflow for uploading, licensing, and describing media.

"We are thrilled that the Ford Foundation is supporting this project," said Wikimedia Executive Director Sue Gardner in a statement issued today by the Wikimedia Foundation.

  • Minimize the Financial Pain of a Divorce
    It's not a pretty thought, but marriages break up, littering an already tough time with financial negotiations and hardships. The Wall Street Journal recommends holding off on selling assets in a down market...
  • Google starts discussion about how to speed up the Web
    Google has launched a new site to encourage discussion about how to improve performance on the Web. It includes resources for developers and discussion forums for brainstorming. With the hope of accelerating the Internet...
  • 10 Twitter Best Practices for Brands
    Michael Brito is a social media strategist and community builder at Intel. You can catch him writing in his social media blog, Twitter or Facebook at all hours of the day/night...
More stories ...
Full Article
Shared the story: Dear Avinash: Web Metrics & Analytics Questions, Facebook Edition

Merlot Rose A few weeks back I had asked this question on Twitter: Inspire me: If there is one web analytics question you want answered what would it be? What’s your juiciest / mundane, daily, challenge?

The result was this post: Top Web Analytics Questions, Twitter Edition.

Those 16 questions (!) were just one part of the story.

My twitter account is linked to my facebook account , so my tweets get posted as my status updates.

That means I got a bunch of questions on the facebook account as well. . . .

facebook analytics question

Here is a summary of the 9 questions / topics that are addressed in this blog post:

  1. Twitter’s impact on bounce rates.
  2. Does complete information translate into absolute action?
  3. The most important business questions addressed by Web Analytics.
  4. How to judge someone’s talent/ability in being a Web Analyst?
  5. The mystery of “Returning Visitors” having 1 Visit to Purchase!
  6. Reliability, and effectiveness, of Predictive Web Analytics.
  7. How to measure impact of Branding activities?
  8. Metrics / Key Performance Indicators to check Daily (!), for any site (!!).
  9. Tips and best practices for Filters and Expressions in Google Analytics.

So here we go, replies to my facebook friends, things that keep them up at night. . . .

Dror Zaifman:

How do you think Twitter will effect bounce rates on web sites ? Meaning do you think that someone reading a Twitter post will get more excited due to the heighten hype on Twitter and therefore might be disappointed with the end result increasing the bounce rates?

twitter birdTwitter will no more increase your bounce rates than say a digg or a stumbleupon or pick your favorite “hot right how” web 2.0 thingy .

In the sense that each of these channels tends to bring new traffic to your site, perhaps a higher percent of them might not be totally relevant for you. But I am not sure that the traffic from Twitter has any higher levels of ADD. :)

As to they weather they should be disappointed or not, that’s your call. If you/others just use Twitter to hype what you do or push sub optimal content then you lose credibility, followers and more. So the system is “self correcting”.

John Quarto-vonTivadar:

True or False? If you had 100% metaphysical certitude analytics coverage and could know anything you wanted to know, would some companies still be unable to increase their conversion rate? I depressingly suspect the answer is True. Remember I am not a rocket scientist. You need to dumb this down for me! :)

Let me rephrase John’s question (he is a rocket scientist!): Even if we had all the data in the world would some companies still stink beyond belief in their ability to improve conversion rate?

I am afraid the answer, as John predicted, is a depressing True.

This is not a data problem. It is a people problem. Or perhaps better put it is an Organization Behavior problem.

y2k clocksI think most of the time we underestimate two things:

1] Data is just data and you need to invest in analysis (and hence people) and most companies just want tools (or as you put it “acquire the solution”). At some point tools will move from simply puking data to giving insights with no human requirement. That day is not today. Or tomorrow. Or 2010.

2] It takes a lot to get over oneself (in this case the HiPPO’s), we can present data and win arguments yet people have deeply entrenched opinions that they are unwilling to set aside to actually implement what the data says. And of course I am not even going to touch on politics and solving for vested personal interests.

For example I am dealing with someone now who is doing the worst possible thing for the long term simply because he/she can get a promotion in the short term. And that’s not even the worst of the problems that “data” has to deal with every day.

Result: Lower Conversions.

Sad.

Eric Werner:

What are the most common important business questions addressed by web analytics? - I find that a lot of marketing managers who are newly introduced to analytics say this is great - so what should I measure? I tell them it depends on the business questions they want answered and then they ask what questions should I want answered?

The single greatest root cause of failure with web analytics is the unwillingness or inability to understand what the site is trying to do, and hence defining goals.

While the real answer to your question is: it depends, let me try to see if I can help.

First tell them that Web Analytics can help measure three specific Outcomes from a website (more in the twitter analytics post):

1] Increased Revenue.

2] Reduced Costs.

3] Improved Customer Satisfaction/Loyalty.

Your question to them is: “Which of these are you working on? I can help you measure each or all of these if you tell me what you are doing.”

red question

That should help focus them a bit and secondly get you started with the most perfect start in Web Analytics: Tying numbers to Outcomes (leads, conversions, loyalty, phone calls, downloads, whatever).

If they refuse to tell you which of the above they they are solving for. . . first submit your resume at Monster.com and start looking for a job, the company you are working for is going down. . . then tell them that web analytics can help answer these questions:

Q1: What is the intent that is driving people to our websites?
[Use the search keywords report, and internal site search.]

Q2: How do people find our websites?
[Use your referring url's reports.]

Q3: How many people land on our site, puke on it, and leave right away?
[Use your bounce rate data, for site, keywords and ref urls.]

Q4: What content do people consume on our website?
[Use your content reports, top content, plot a head and tail curve, that will get you a big hug!]

Q5: What calls to action, navigational elements do people engage with on our pages?
[Use the site overlay report, for your top 10 most viewed pages.]

Q6: Where are you spending money inefficiently?
[Use the campaigns reports, focus on where your company / Marketers are spending money right how: Search, Email, Affiliates....]

Q7: Are we making money? Reducing cost? Increasing Customer loyalty?
[Sorry could not resist, I had to hammer this in again, it is so important you measure this.]

Hope this helps Eric. More on this post if you are interested: Tips for Web Analytics Success for Businesses.

Tal Galili:

How can you (and where can’t you) quantify a persons talent/ability in being a web analyst? How could I judge my own performance as a web analyst?

I look for:

1] Critical Thinking
(Interviewing Tip: Stress Test Critical Thinking. Please.)

2] Business Experience
(If all they have is button pressing / report publishing experience they might be very young in their career and that is ok, but if not I am looking for people who have business / marketing / finance experience, if they are a Marketer they get bonus points from me.)

3] High EQ (emotional quotient)
(Wikipedia: The ability, capacity, a self-perceived ability, to identify, assess, and manage the emotions of one’s self, of others, and of groups. Me: One person, no matter how high on the IQ scale can rarely change organizations alone.)student report card

4] Flexibility in thinking, an openness to new information.
(You might think this is obvious, who is dumb enough to stay dug in when faced with new information. You’ll be surprised. I also look for people whose core thinking is not rigid, they realize the world is not perfect, they realize data is incomplete, they realize web Analytics, as in clickstream, is not panacea.)

5] Knowledge Seekers
(I mentioned in a recent interview that I spend three to four hours a week learning something new about our field. Trying new tools. New types of analysis. Reading non-pompous-only-theory-gossip blogs that share new methods of thinking. Attending free webinars in broad fields. I feel I am not doing enough. Find people that invest atleast that much a week.)

If you are doing these things I think you are on the right path. Certainly learn to use more tools and what not. But enrich your mind, keep it open and flexible, think like a marketer.

Good luck Tal.

Robert Patterson:

Can you please explain how the Visits to Purchase Google Analytics report segmenting new and returning visitors can show returning visitors making a 1 visit purchase? Wouldn’t that make them a new visitor purchase and not a returning visitor purchase?

Robert’s question is one of those that you dig into and discover something deeply sub optimal. I am especially sad because this is one of my favorite pan session report.

Here’s what Robert is asking:

google analytics visits to purchase

See that red arrow? If someone is a “Returning Visitor” why would the report say they purchased after one visit?

Why do you think that is?

Think about it….

Take a guess….

Aw come one…..

I’ll give you one more try…. come on Justin you know this one….

Got the answer?

Not its what what you thought.

This report is wrong in Google Analytics. Well that’s not entirely right. Technically the label on top of the report is wrong. And what it actually measures then makes it useless.

I am getting ahead of myself.

What this report actually measures is: Visits to Purchase from the last Campaign.

Only it does not say that either in the label or in the in page help.

Take three scenarios:

Angie: Visit from paid search campaign. Direct Visit. Visit from email campaign -> Purchase.

What the report shows: Visits to Purchase: 1. (See how Angie is a returning visitor? Yes.)

What a correct report would show: Visits to Purchase: 3.

Jennifer (Angie’s bff): Paid search visit. Direct visit. Organic visit. Bookmark visit. Direct visit. Direct visit -> Purchase.

What the report shows: Visits to Purchase: 3.

What a correct report would show: Visits to Purchase: 6.

Judith (Angie’s part of the time bff): Affiliate visit. Direct visit. Bookmark visit. Direct visit -> Purchase.

What the report shows: Visits to Purchase: 4.

What a correct report would show: Visits to Purchase: 4.

In summary, Google Analytics will only count the number of visits after a campaign (and campaigns in GA are email, affiliate, paid search, organic search,.. literally everything except direct/bookmark) and show that on this report.

That means this report, another one I love, is also wrongly labeled:

google analytics days to purchase

The correct label for this is Days to Purchase from the last Campaign.

I am sure the team at Google will fix the label.

The challenge of course is that while the name change will mean the report will have the right description, it will essentially be useless.

Just look at the above three scenarios. If they are all in the Days/Visits to Purchase from the Last Campaign what actionable insight do you get?

You are still ten million miles away from understand how long does it take for someone to convert.

The fix is not a change in the label, the fix is scraping the report and actually creating a real Days to Purchase and Visits to Purchase reports. If I want to know how many days/visits it takes someone to convert from a organic or paid or email campaign I can always segment that data and view the clean report. Here I don’t even know what the “last campaign” was.

Sorry Robert. And to all of you as well.

John Stansbury:

Based on performance through yesterday, how reliably can I predict where we’ll end up EOD today? (Initial promising results using Holt-Winter adaptive forecasting, but time- and effort- intensive.) Additionally, how granular is too granular for actionable analysis? Is that determined by the agility of your site to adapt?

I wish there was a easy answer to this, sadly no.

Both your questions can be very specific to the business, the goals of the website, seasonal factors unique to you, the overall business strategy (and sub components of that applied on the web), yada, yada, yada.

But regardless of your business you’ll face these six challenges in your attempt to do “predictive analytics” on your web data:

data mining and predictive analytics challenge[1]

All the details are in this post: Data Mining And Predictive Analytics On Web Data Works? Nyet!

As to your second question, how granular is too granular for actionable analysis, you’ll typically work with a portfolio. As you execute your analysis train yourself to recognize when you are reaching the point of diminishing margins of return. Then you stop, move on to the next thing.

More in this post, see #3: Bounces, Abandonment, Visitor Ratios & Data Drops!

One last tip, always seek to balance what you can do (analysis/insights) with what your company/site/HiPPO can actually action. What they can action might not be the top nine powerful actionable high impact things, they could only do ten through fifteen. Then forget the top nine.

Sucks. I know.

Martin Leblanc:

How do you measure the effect of branding activities?

This is a complicated issue and I might not do it complete justice in a short reply, but let me outline some broad brush strokes.

I believe that branding is a worthy Marketing goal. It gets people to associate, hopefully, positive attributes with your products and services. Here’s one of the masters at branding:

abercrombie-fitch email campaign

Abercrombie & Fitch . The image above is not their website, it is their complete email campaign. The minor text at the bottom is the opt-out and their address. No call to action (!).

It certainly evokes an emotional reaction, perhaps a brand attribute they would want associated with them.

Measurement?

I firmly believe that every marketing activity has to drive outcomes. It can drive it now, it can drive it in 30 days, it can drive it in six months.

I believe that if you do “branding” you need to define an outcome, increased store sales, more people to the site, more leads for a future concert, newspaper stories from your out of the world campaign, something else.

If there is an outcome you can measure it. My favorites for measuring impact from branding campaigns, for the web:

  • Increased Visitor Loyalty and Recency measures post campaign.
  • If related to a product, increased sales (even if latent conversions).
  • Improved “likelihood to recommend” scores, during / post campaign, as measured by exit surveys.

My favorite way to measure impact of branding campaigns is to do rigorous controlled experiments. They can prove anything, trust me.

For more on this check out #6 here: Multi Channel Analytics.

Claire Devereux Thompson:

I have to check many client sites every day to make sure that things are going smoothly - what’s the one thing that I need to look at if I only have a minute for each?

I was stumped so asked Claire for a bit more.

Claire clarified (say that five times :) that her clients include non-profits that use the web to raise money, a small art school, a large regional furniture site, a online only gift store.

I am still stumped!

The real answer of course is: It Depends.

Fat good that does Ms. Thompson. So let me try to pull a rabbit out of the hat.

My first stab at this would be to look at Outcomes (Goals).

google analytics goal convresion report

The above data is for a non-ecommerce, not for profit website. It has four goals, and for each quantified goal values.

It is easy to see daily progress (if that’s important), certainly weekly, by looking both at the sparklines next to each goal and also the two sweet numbers at the bottom.

Bottom line: Bottom line is important. Ask each biz to do this, add it to your dashboard. [Ideas for goals for different sites here: Measure Macro AND Micro Conversions.]

My second bunny, sorry tip, would be to focus acquisition, and the idea of the What’s Changed Report.

After you install the Enhanced Google Analytics plugin from our friends at Juice Analytics you’ll be able to something like this:

google analytics what's changed report

In your referring sites report you can click on the Who sent me unusual traffic? button and it will show you sites that have increased by 50% in traffic, or dropped 50%.

In the Keywords report you’ll see the same thing but with search keywords.

Both help you get away from the top 10 reports, that rarely change, and help you identify big shifts in keywords and referrers which should in turn help you know if something needs your attention.

I hope the above two sets of ideas help, but what I want you to focus more on is the philosophy I am advocating: 1) Start with Outcomes, always. 2) Focus only on what changes, that mining will help find gems.

Oh and it is a bit of work, even every day. No insight worth monetizing is ever free. Hmm… that’s pretty profound. No? :)

Robert Kennedy:

How to get the most out of your filters/ expressions in Google Analytics. I am always pushing that angle of analytics, sometimes I mix up some wild concoctions :). Seems you are only limited by knowledge and imagination with no floor or ceiling. What is the best resource for filters and expressions?

Can I fess up that I never use them, mostly because perhaps I am not doing the same kinds of analysis.

There is one other reason. I have this constant hyper filter on: what’s the marginal value of me digging a bit more, doing this fancy filters/expression magic?

Google Analytics Shortcuts For me Advanced Segments suffices most of the times.

All that said three resources for you:

  1. Robbin “I am the queen of GA expressions” Stief: Regular Expressions Part XII: Bad Greed. Yes that’s part 12!
  2. EpikOne’s Regular Expression Filter Tester. Its really good for QA’ing things before you put them in the wild.
  3. Not owing Justin Cutroni’s Google Analytics Short Cuts book is now considered a felony in 49 states (all except Utah for some reason). So get it!

I think that should get you going Robert, perhaps it is time for you to start tweeting your favorite expressions and filters? :)

There you go, nine questions that were top of mind for people who ran into my request for inspiration on Facebook.

These are very broad and complex questions, very difficult to answer in a short Q&A, but I hope you all find the answers to be be of some value.

Ok now your turn.

How would you have answered any of these questions differently? Did I miss something in one of the answers? Agree, disagree, shout with joy, cry with pleasure. . . do please share your thoughts.

Thank you.

Copyright © 2006-2009 Occam's Razor by Avinash Kaushik

Dear Avinash: Web Metrics & Analytics Questions, Facebook Edition


Full Article
Google Money Pro - get google to list your site
Please note: if your site is listed with Google already, then any further attempt in submission would not help expedite listing. In case you have never tried submissions before and want to know where the page is where such submissions can be done, look fo
Full Article
Eric Ward Interviewed by Eric Enge
Published: December 22, 2008

Eric Ward founded the Web's first link building and web promotion services, called NetPOST and URLwire, in 1994. Today Eric offers those services as well as training and private consulting to help companies learn how to generate links, publicity and online buzz for their Web content. Eric has developed content linking strategies for PBS.org, WarnerBros, The Discovery Channel, National Geographic, The New York Times, TVGuide.com, and Weather.com.

Eric won the 1995 Tenagra Award For Internet Marketing Excellence, and in 1997 was named one of the Web's 100 most influential people by Websight magazine. Eric also writes the LinkWeek column for search industry news site SearchEngineLand.com, and has written for Web Marketing Today, ClickZ, MarketingProfs, and Ad Age Magazine. Depending on the weather, Eric resides in Knoxville, Tennessee or Seagrove Beach Florida.

Interview Transcript

Eric Enge: Let's talk about some of the challenges inherent in getting links to very large sites that are content rich. How do you, as a link builder, think about a plan to help these people?

Eric Ward: Clients that are content rich are great because they have all of the things they needed to accomplish a terrific inbound link profile. They just want to improve it and they want it to be better. I guess one of the ways I approach it is even though it's a big, successful site, sometimes you can be so big and so successful that you forget how you got to be that way in the first place.

You can almost take things for granted at a certain point. One of the first areas I look at is if they made their content as portable and as linkable as possible for the people who are already on their site. You work so hard to get these people to your site, so we want to know which pages of your site are the most likely and logical to be shared. Ask yourself on any given page of your content, what can a person do while on this page?

I don't necessarily just mean the obvious like bookmark this page, or share this with a friend, or add this to your Google bookmarks which are all fine. It's almost expected nowadays that you would have some sort of code on your page that allows a person with a mouse in their hand to very quickly take that piece of a page and move it into the bookmarking programs that they use. . Unfortunately, I think web sites emphasize this too much. People think that the thing should be socialized, and no one probably will.

So, with a big site, I just look at it from the standpoint of a user on the site. So if I am on a page that I like, what are the things that I might want to do at this page, and what are the things that they are allowing me to do? And, even without those Chiclets, even without the little buttons if you are a Digg power user, it doesn't mean it's not going to happen.

Who knows what content might have never been famous without Chiclets. People's attention's spans today are very small. If I've got to open a new tab or open a new window, then I could type in Digg.com and openit and sign into my user account. It's a difference between something that takes five seconds and something that takes a minute. And, I understand that, that's a deal breaker. So, that's the first thing I do.

Eric Enge: So let's say somebody puts deli.cio.us, Magnolia, StumbleUpon, and other strictly bookmarking sites chiclets on their page (we will lead Digg and Reddit and social news sites out of it for the time being), what's your experience with how that kind of bookmarking ultimately helps the linked profile?

Eric Ward: I don't know the answer to that exactly. The fact that it happens I think is meaningless. I think any engine looking to analyze the social links profile has to care about whether or not it can trust the signal it's getting, no matter where it comes from. It has to look for different things from a StumbleUpon.com/user/whomever, and stumbleupon.com/user/eward.

One of those profiles could be extremely useful to Google, whereas another one might have absolutely no value whatsoever. I can't sit here and say that I know every single factor that Google considers, but I think there are some pretty obvious ones. I think that the collection of sites bookmarked start to tell a little bit about a particular user.I could be really vigilant about bookmarking every site devoted to lung cancer that is from the CDC, or the National Library of Medicine, or Harvard Medical School. I could have 300 links from dot govs, dot edus, and then one of them could then be my site for a mesothelioma lawyer.

What I am trying to do with a bookmark account or a StumbleUpon account is make it look as though it is credible. But, I had an agenda with the idea that maybe I can just bookmark so much quality that I can stick my client's sight in here, and then that will work.

It might possibly work for a while, but unless you are really tending to the garden, that's all you do. If you are not continuously modifying, updating, and working your StumbleUpon account, then you are starting to send a signal to Google that you really don't care that much about it and Google really shouldn't trust it much.

There will be a trail that will tell things about you, including the frequency with which you update your user profile, or add new content. You could try anything you want to try to do to gain. I guess what I am saying is that I really feel bad for anybody whose inbound link profile is based upon something that's fake.

Eric Enge: Sure, absolutely. There is a secondary question here which is, is there any sense that people see something in StumpleUpon or deli.cio.us or something like that and later link to it?

Eric Ward: Yes it is certainly possible. I have the toolbar in place myself, and I regularly look though it. As much as I am online, I am not a bookmarker. I don't have time to bookmark cool pages for other people to see. Maybe it's a generational thing, but I just don't care. I also think you have to remember that with the signals that you get, people get really excited about things.

Then their life intervenes, they grow up, they decide what they don't need and they no longer feel the need to share every minute of what they do in their blog. They are passionate about this bookmark account, and then they are not so. I mean it's like the world is filled with ghost blogs; the world is filled with ghost bookmarking accounts as well.

It's just the nature of the web. It's up to the engines to figure out when they are crawling something that has some value to us. If I am Google, I personally don't feel that there is anything to make me feel as though I should rank aside based on a social media inbound link profile.

That doesn't mean it can't happen, but I don't think that Google wants that to happen, or we'd feel comfortable with the idea that that could happen. So, I think they are all very cool services. There are always people who just immediately ask how this plays into their search ranking. They want to try to understand that maybe there is that group of people who immediately want to abuse it. But, if I am Google, and I don't have a PhD, I don't know anything about algorithms, but I don't consider the social media sites as a factor.

Eric Enge: Alright. So, what are some of the other things to think about then?

Eric Ward: I think social media is one of the ways I may find a passionate influencer or somebody passionate about a subject that's already there. I am not going to create my own StumbleUpon account just to bookmark a site for a client. What you can do is, if you have a site about fitness training for example, you can look for people with profiles that have a lot of health and fitness sites. Then you can try to contact them and let them know what you have.

This is really back to link building as public relations again, it's just that my influencer here happens to be a heavy duty StumbleUpon user. What influence does that have on your search rankings? Nothing frankly, unless of course, they end up linking to you.

But even if it doesn't, the person you contact might have forty or fifty people sharing his StumbleUpon links with. Or, maybe he also has a deli.cio.us account, or Magnolia, or Reddit, or whatever. But, still what I try to do is look for the person who is already passionate about that topic, because he can carry my message a lot further than I can.

If I have an awesome site about subject x, I've got to find people passionate about subject x that are also passionate about the web or about one of those tools, and then get the word out to them. It will either work or it won't. I think that's a more honest approach to me, rather than immediately going and creating a bunch of sock puppet accounts just to bookmark this one site. I'd love to see the statistics on what percentage of social bookmarking accounts are logged into less than one time once a month.

I don't think that there is ever any harm in creating an account just to try to familiarize yourself with the lay of the land within a particular social world, whether it's bookmarking or whatever. I do that myself, because I have to understand. Nothing would be worse to me to just say that's crap, it doesn't work or that's a waste of time when I have never even touched it.

So, I want to look at these things, and this is how I came to my belief that Nofollowed or not Wikipedia has got has a tremendous amount of power from a link building standpoint. I don't ignore a Wikipedia because there is no search ranking benefit. My personal opinion is that I do not believe that rankings on any major engine are yet influenced enough where a person working as third party on behalf of content can work their way on to page one just by social media alone. You could probably pay somebody to get to the Digg homepage, and from doing that you get 15,000 visits. And that's cool because it's totally different than working your way up to Google's main page just by having a link from the Digg homepage.

Eric Enge: So, let's take a different slice at our large site problem for a moment. Say a site has 10,000 links. One of the things that occurs to me when you look at that is that your strategy is always very dependent on the nature of the content they have and those kinds of things. But, if they have 10,000 links today, one strategy would be to get them similar quality links, in which case I am guessing that they have moved their traffic needle. We are not going to move their traffic needle with 500 more links with the same quality as the 10,000 they already have, right?

Eric Ward: I would agree with that.

Eric Enge: So, I was thinking within terms of if they have 10,000, if we stay with the similar quality approach, I'd probably need to add 3,000 links. But of course, the other option is to go for higher quality links so that you can be more rifle shot oriented. Does that kind of thinking make sense in your mind?

Eric Ward: Well, it's certainly not easy. I guess one thing you could always do with them is ask which content on their site is the oldest versus the newest. What are the things that have shown the ability to attract links? For example, I have a client that's in the building supplies industry. Right now the idea of sustainability, all things green is a very hot subject area that lends itself to passionate content creators, vertical engines, vertical guides, librarians devoting massive amounts of resources to subject guides about that.

If you create a page that is something that you legitimately do and do well that can be link worthy, you might want to look at what content is worth investing in as part of a more strenuous link building effort. There are people that want to renovate their house and they don't want to do it with anything that's going to hurt the environment.

If you've got content that you can create, you can probably attract a nice collection of links from people who are interested in this type of thing because that's something that people can get passionate about.

Eric Ward: Sometimes you can do back link analysis just to see where you're getting nibbles.

Eric Enge: Well, I think one of the things that you talked about before that was important was the notion of making it easy for people. When you have a site that gets 10,000 links already, you want to make it easy for those people to link to you if that's what they are interested in doing. So, if you have an information rich site and it's been getting a lot of its revenue from AdSense, for example, you probably don't want the AdSense ad to be the first occupy all the space above the fold.

I spend time thinking about quantity oriented tactics and quality oriented tactics. What should I try to do to get many hundreds or thousands of links, versus what I might do to get very high quality links. If there is a way to persuade significant pages on the MIT website (a PR10 domain) to link to you that are very high quality links, and it's probably worth a lot of individual attention.

Eric Ward: Right. I'd agree with that completely.

Eric Enge: Right. And then, on the quantity side, if I am trying to get thousands of links, I am clearly not going to do that by hand emailing everyone.

Eric Ward: When people ask me about getting clean links too fast, I tell them that it's impossible. If you are getting legitimate links, you are not going to get them too fast.

Eric Enge: There are general approaches like implementing a PR campaigns. Or if you can manage to get into a major magazine somehow, then you might get a bunch of links fast. Or if you're using Digg and have content that is suitable for those audiences, maybe something gets hot there, and can produce a pile of links. Or, maybe a widget strategy would work also, as a way of syndicating your content.

Eric Ward: Oh sure, yes. I think the greatest value is recognizing when you are dealing with a client who has content for which something like a widget is even worth discussing or not. Let's say you have no links, a brand new site, the best content ever about whatever the subject is, and you want links fast. First of all you have to make sure that the people you are about to try to attract to your site could take it and run with it. You have to give them the ability to help you meet your goal of attracting links.

Certainly if press and publicity works for you, go out with that. You've got to try to reach the masses if your goal is mass links. But at the same time that's going on, you can't just assume that people most likely to be passionate about your content are going to come across it because you've sent out a press release out or you've enabled it to be bookmarkable. In my opinion, someone still has to go out there and find those people most likely to care and contact them.

You will know fairly quickly if they think you have great content. If you've got really good content, it really shouldn't be that hard. In my opinion if you do it properly you will get the links that you deserve to get. It's not like you should have to pull teeth and beg for links. If you do then something is wrong with your content.

I find the biggest challenge for me is getting to the people who can make a decision as link building is becoming more popular, and people are getting hammered with requests for stuff that's just off topic and not relevant. It's getting tougher and tougher to get the highest and most trustworthy links.

Eric Enge: One of the things that you've touched upon here that's worth expanding on is the role of content. I mean you can have a site that has really good solid content, but it's not remarkable. You can get links to a site like that, but it's challenging.

Eric Ward: Say a dentist has a website, and he is a good dentist and he loves dentistry and he cares about what he does. He has a nice website and he really cares about your root canal. And, he wants you to know everything about your root canal and he has written some awesome content about your root canal, but so have 17,000 other dentists.

What you have to do sometimes is realign expectations and ask yourself why people are visiting your site. What you really care about is dental health in Knoxville, Tennessee or the best dentists in Knoxville? In other words, helping them to realize that they don't need 5,000 links, what they need is 17 links from the right people in the region that they are trying to appeal to.

I mean no matter how passionate you are about a subject, you are going to reach a person that with something they care about. It's like the fine folks that make Compound W, the wart remover; can they do everything they possibly can do to create a website devoted to the art and science of wart removal, but you have to think about who is going to link to that type of content.

It's about not being afraid to tell the client what they face; the client that thinks that just because he is a good dentist, his site should be in the top five needs a dose of reality.

It's not easy to have to explain to the client that it's not because he has done anything wrong.

Eric Enge There has to be something unique and different if you are trying to reach the top in a very competitive area. On the other hands, Poughkeepsie root canal is probably not that competitive of a term, and you can probably accomplish what you want without having to be quite so remarkable.

Eric Ward: Right, I totally agree. In fact you might not need to be remarkable at all. For companies who are good at what they do, but, for no fault of their own, just don't have a particular truly differentiating content message, it is going to be hard. You are basically always going to be looking for some sort of trick, or you are going to be hoping that you understand a little bit more about how Google works than the next guy.

Ultimately there is nothing different enough about your site to send a true signal to Google. So, really all you can do is hope to get in the flow of what Google is looking for. So, when someone does a search on Root Canal Poughkeepsie it looks like there are these seven places where the site showing up has got reviews. Well, I need to encourage reviews then.

Maybe I need to offer some incentive. Maybe I need to give every client that walks out my door a little appointment card with a little note that says, want to receive 10% off your next cleaning? Go to ratemydoc.com and type in my name and my address, and enter a review of what you think about me and print out your page. And if you come in with that next time you get 10% off or a free cleaning or something like that.

You could argue that's a paid link, and that's fine. And so, this is now more to marketing than link building, and it's not even public relations. There it's more about taking what's not necessarily remarkable, but recognizing what it is that Google is looking for.

Eric Ward: Ask yourself if there is a way that you can get in that trust flow. If you have great content already you don't need to focus on content. Then you just have to decide what's the best way you can rank without having to use pay per click.

You could invest all your time and effort on that and have 57 reviews, and see your site actually show up in the top ten reviews and be very proud of yourself. And then, the following Monday is when Google decides that in general for Poughkeepsie dentists, they are not going to show that box anymore.

So you've got to hope that those individual sites, ratemydoc, or ratemydent, or rootcanaldocs, are doing a great job of getting in front of users. All the work that you did to get in there hoping to influence Google's results is gone now. You may have to explain these types of challenges to your client and tell them, you've got an awesome site, I am not arguing that with you, but so do 1500 other dentists in this county.

Therefore, here is how we need to approach this. If we are going to rank well organically, and if we have nothing that's going to separate us from anybody else content wise, what other choices do we have if we don't want to pay for pay per click? We can go local. We can try the social media angle and hope that Google might give us a little more credit for having a bunch of social links. But, how many people at StumbleUpon are just waiting to link to Poughkeepsie dentist? None.

So, now you are back to creating a sock puppet account, or asking all of your clients to go click. You are giving them something that says reviewme and rateadoc, and also telling them to create a StumbleUpon account and bookmark me.

Pretty soon you are going to have to start paying your customer. So, I am not meaning to make fun of it; it's just part of the frustration that people face. People think that there is some sort of a secret. People think that they are doing something wrong, or that a competitor knows something that they don't.

In reality, the problem for so many is that the overwhelming majority of businesses that have a web presence have no true discernable content quality signals that will engender the kind of links to give Google any sort of confidence that one is any better than the other. I don't know that you can ever move the needle once you get to that point without deciding you want to be something that you might not want to be with your website.

Eric Enge: Let's get back to the scenario where we are dealing with the site that has a lot of content. What are your thoughts on packaging up the content in some form and syndicating articles in order to get links?

Eric Ward: I would not say that I am against it. I think the question you always have to ask yourself about this particular tactic is if there is anything about it that will preclude your competitor from being able to employ the exact same tactic. If so it's simply a matter of who is going to do it first, and who can stay ahead of the game. You have to ask yourself, what is it about this tactic that in anyway differentiates you from anybody else?

I am not saying article marketing itself is bad. I just think that it's one of those things that it's the same exact problem looked at a little differently, which is creating content. I am more tempted to say don't create articles for other sites if you are creating content. So, if you are going to go to that extent, create your own article database and make them sharable. And, if you want to submit them someplace that's fine, but have them show date of birth and first existence on your site first.

If you want to try to do something with them that's fine. But, don't let the tail wag the dog here, just because you are not passionate about creating that content to begin with. I don't think it's going to ever end up mattering, but ask yourself the same question about the Poughkeepsie dentist, and what long term edge is gained if you have 10 dentists all doing article marketing. I hate to say it, but it's such a fruitless pursuit in some ways in the online world, because anything you do also leaves trails that a savvy competitor can identify.

If your content ultimately doesn't have anything about it that can't be replicated by a competitor, then all you can really hope for is enough of a lead that you can move on to the next thing. Your competitors can figure out what you did with that last thing, and they are going to be right on your doorstep again. There is no time for resting on your laurels with generic link building.

Link building of this type isn't driven by truly meritorious content. If you hire some kid that's going to get his masters degree in journalism to write 25 articles about the care and feeding about dental health, just so you can try to push these articles to somewhere else, you've done nothing that can't be replicated by some other dentists hiring some other journalist or journalism student to write some other articles that you haven't yet written about.

here really isn't anything different. You have to make that hard decision to either accept that you can't differentiate and decide not to play, or to take all that budget and just do pay per click. Or you have to ask yourself, what can I do that nobody else could do? And, for any different given website, or subject, or business, it's going to be different. Perhaps you are the only dentist in town that deals with little kids. Sometimes it's a hard question to ask as the person may say well nothing. But it really is the question you need to answer.

Eric Enge: Thanks Eric!

Eric Ward: Thank you!

Have comments or want to discuss? You can comment on the Eric Ward interview here.

Other Recent Interviews


About the Author

Eric Enge is the President of Stone Temple Consulting. Eric is also a founder in Moving Traffic Incorporated, the publisher of Custom Search Guide, a directory of Google Custom Search Engines, and City Town Info, a site that provides information on 20,000 US Cities and Towns.

Stone Temple Consulting (STC) offers search engine optimization and search engine marketing services, and its web site can be found at: http://www.stonetemple.com.

For more information on Web Marketing Services, contact us at:

Stone Temple Consulting
(508) 485-7751 (phone)
(603) 676-0378 (fax)
info@stonetemple.com

Full Article
Why Your Web Site Is Important? - Montreal web Design
Your Competitor Has A Web Site Customers use the Internet to find everything. A small competitor or start-up gains instant credibility with a well-constructed web site design. If theirs is the only site found, that's who your potential customer will buy from. Don't let your competitor be the first to construct a web site. It takes months for a site to become visible in the Search Engines. Internet marketing is a track meet. Get off the blocks first! Satisfied Customers More Easily Tell Friends An email with your web site address is a lot easier than finding and faxing or mailing a brochure. A web site = easy, efficient referrals. A Web Site Beats Hiring A Salesperson When the number of clients generated by a web site are compared with advertising and salesforce costs, a web site provides a much higher Return On Investment (ROI). Customers Look For You On The Internet Using Google to find a person's or company's phone number or address is so popular it's called "Googling." Make sure you're there when you or your company is "Googled." The Best Customers Use The Internet Well-funded, well-equipped businesses use the Internet extensively for email and to gather information. These are the most valuable prospects- they have money to spend! If they can't find you, they may go somewhere else. Customers Investigate Before Making Contact The anonymity of the web has given the customer an advantage-they can investigate without personal contact and avoid repeated sales calls or giving away information through personal queries. They can visit your site and decide if you have the goods or service that they want. This also means that the customer who makes contact is "pre-qualified" - they already know you have what they want, making your job easier. Web Site ROI, Much Better Than Brochure ROI When the cost of creating, printing, distributing and updating a brochure is taken into consideration, your more-easily-maintained web site is a better investment. We know a brochure can be important, but, if you have a brochure you should have a web site. If you don't have a brochure, you should create a web site first. A Web Site Makes Your Business Card More Effective A business card is low-cost and gives your customer a way to remember you. But, the most common information kept is the email address and the web site address. You Can Tell Your Story Since you control your web site's contents, you can tell your complete story. It's the one arena you control absolutely. Most customers will not visit your offices and they may miss or ignore advertising. The secretary who answers the phone may flub the call. But you control absolutely how your web site presents itself. It serves as a credibility and competency check for every visitor. The Bottom Line Every business needs a web site. This may be most important for a small business that cannot afford missed opportunities and needs the most efficient way to conduct its affairs. What Should You Do? Already have a web site? If so, unext step is to make it visible by search engines SEO, Cygnus can help decide if anything more needs to be done. Don't have a web site? If this article makes business sense to you, contact us (info@cygnus-es.com-514.999.5303) and let's talk about what we can do for you. We can build a web site in stages, starting with a small site designed for easy, logical expansion as you gain more confidence in this new medium.
Full Article
Alex Chudnovsky Interviewed by Eric Enge
Published: December 29, 2008

Alex Chudnovsky is the founder and managing director of Majestic-12 - a UK based firm that specializes in cross-platform .NET/C# development of scalable high-performance data analysis applications with primary focus on creation of the World Wide Web search engine. Majestic also uses the trade name Majestic SEO which publishes a backlinking tool that is a competitor to SEOmoz's Linkscape.

Alex previously worked for a number of well-known retail businesses with primary focus on maximizing sales from their respective retail web sites. Utilizing extensive business and technical skills for Jungle.com (part of the Argos Retail Group), formerly top 10 UK e-tail website that handled over a billion hits annually, Alex led many significant projects with a proven overall economic effect of over £15 m in additional online sales.

Interview Transcript

Eric Enge: Tell me a little bit about Majestic-SEO at a company level.

Alex Chudnovsky: We have a registered company in the UK, which is called Majestic-12 Limited, and we started a distributed search engine project four years ago. The goal is to build a viable alternative to Google. And because we were small and they were big, we had to find some ways of catching up. The way that we chose was to develop distributed computing on the internet.

Projects such as SETI@Home, distributed.net were the basis of the approach we took. We created software and we started crawling the web using volunteers all around the world. This is our main project, and it has been going on for four years now. About two years ago, when we used the data to create a full-text search index, we had one billion pages indexed. As we were building it bigger and bigger, we realized that relevance was becoming a problem.

You can't beat Google unless you are as relevant as Google. The solution for this was to look more closely at the web graph, look at the backlinks and analyze link text in order to be just as smart about it as Google is. You really have to do that, because when you rank in competitive categories, you have so many matches that you have to discriminate against many of them to decide which ones are the best and most relevant.

This is where backlinks come into play big time, because that's really one of the key objective ways to differentiate between more popular and less popular sites. When we realized this two years ago, it became clear that we needed a separate index that would help us understand backlinks and link text better. So, we started working on the so-called “anchor index” and we've been doing it for two years with many index builds.

It was very, very difficult to build a large index that was close to that of Yahoo and Google. But, we built it, and early this year we launched a commercial offshoot to help us fund further R&D activities. This is what Majestic-SEO was designed for. It is the same company, but it's our trading name that we use to position ourselves in the SEO industry.

So, what we have in Majestic-SEO is the biggest publicly available backlinks index. It allows webmasters to verify their sites and obtain extensive backlinking data for free. If you want information for your competitor websites, then you can pay to obtain reports and compare the websites. It's essentially like Google Webmaster Tools, but you can get information on competitive sites and we show complete data.

Unlike Google, we show all data that we have, and we actually have quite a lot of sites with many millions of backlinks. We will show you the whole lot if you want it. And, we include a number of analytical options that allow you to focus on the areas you are most interested in. So, in a nutshell, this is what Majestic-SEO is about.

Eric Enge: How many web pages have you crawled?

Alex Chudnovsky: So far we have crawled about 114 billion in total (this figure includes urls that failed to get crawled due to various reasons – 404 Not Found, server was down etc). The total crawled data size is over 2.5 peta bytes. If you look at the number of unique pages that we include within our index in Majestic-SEO, we have over 52 billion unique crawled pages in our current index that will grow again in January 2009. We show all these stats on our website. We consider a url being a page if the URL was successfully crawled. We analyze those urls and pick up links from those pages as well as other metrics.

If you look at our database in terms of unique URLs, then we have lots more of those than crawled pages. Google recently claimed to have one trillion unique URLs that they knew of, but they have not crawled them all yet. It's the same with us. For us, the number of unique URLs is 346 billion, 52 billion of which are pages, meaning that these are the URLs that we crawled successfully at least once. Our aim is to catch up with Google by the end of next year.

Eric Enge: You've organized this in a product that people can explore and pull down link profiles for different domains? I presume you do things like pull the anchor text and that sort of stuff?

Alex Chudnovsky: Yes, we supply the link text, if it was present, date when backlink was found, and a number of flags, such as whether it was an image link, or it was a redirect, or whether it was in a frame. The latter can be very useful because you can actually check backlinks for your own site. You can actually find the people who have embedded your site in a frameset, and you may not necessarily see this information from your log files, because if it's in a frameset, the referrer may not be set in log files and it may not be obvious to you that your site was quite literally framed.

We also have a measure of how important the page is, called ACRank. ACRank stands for “A Citation Rank.” What it basically is, is a number from 0 to 15, with higher being better. A higher number shows that there were more referring external domains linking into that page. For example, if both Google and our site's homepages linked to your site, we will rank the Google link higher than ours because Google itself would have a lot more referring domains that point into them.

This allows our customers to focus on the most important links first, because they would know that those links are coming from pages that are themselves very heavily linked to.

Eric Enge: Right. You are doing that based on a proprietary calculation method?

Alex Chudnovsky: Yes, it is very simple at the moment. It's basically an indication of how many unique referring domains will link into the page which links to you.

Eric Enge: When did you release this product?

Alex Chudnovsky: We launched Majestic-SEO in February of this year. We were not selling data at the time we launched it because it was effectively soft-launched as a test to allow webmasters to come to our site and verify their domains to get information for free. So, we were getting all this feedback. In July we launched new option, which allowed our customers to actually buy reports on domains that they do not own. From the commercial point of view we launched in July 2008.

Eric Enge: How many people have signed up so far?

Alex Chudnovsky: We have a lot. It's exceeded our expectations definitely. We are gaining acceptance right now, and we are converting traffic really well. We get a lot of people who come to our site just to verify their own domain and to check out whether the service is good or not.

Then we convert them to actual paying customers because they see that they can look at their own domains and the information we have on their own sites. This is where they become believers in our information, because it's the best way to check.

Eric Enge: What is the commercial model?

Alex Chudnovsky: We have different pricing for different domains. The fundamental issue for us is that some domains are a lot bigger than others. For example, if we take Google as a domain then our database tells me that we have 3.7 billion external backinks to google.com.

When we name this number, it means that we actually have that many backlinks that we can retrieve. This is quite a critical difference from some of our competition. They will often show you a limited number of backlinks, such as what you can get in Yahoo Site Explorer. But in our case, when you buy access to the domain, you get the whole lot, all the information you can retrieve at no extra charge.

So, we have very large domains like google.com and we have small domains like our own site www.MajesticSEO.com. We have one thousand external backlinks in our database at the moment, and that is a number that is growing quite quickly. So, we have different domain pricing which depends on how heavily linked the domain is.

We also offer some time based options. You can subscribe to domains data for seven days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months or 12 months. So for domains that you might just be curious about, it makes sense to buy them for seven days, just to check out the information. Those that you want to keep an eye on for longer, it makes sense to buy for 12 months, as the monthly price gets reduced as you subscribe for longer periods of time.

Eric Enge: What's the cost for a domain that has 10,000 links to it?

Alex Chudnovsky: Let's take your site for example. On your site, we have 78,000 external backlinks coming from 2,500 referring domains as of now. If you look at the price, you can get it for 10 credits for 7 days. Now, we sell credits and we have different packages for credits. If you buy a bigger package, you get a bigger discount. For example, if you are our client and you want to use our service a lot, it makes sense to buy a thousand credits, because you would get a 30% discount on that.

So, if you are a big buyer, the actual price of domains that you buy will be lower for you. In your case, it will be 10 credits for 7 days. In monetary terms, if you buy one thousands credits, it should cost about a dollar a credit. So that means that data on your site could be had for $10. That would include almost 79,000 external backlinks coming from 2,500 referring domains. So, you've got quite a popular website. We are also considering introducing a fixed fee subscription model in Q1 2009.

Eric Enge: That's interesting. Yahoo reports 94,800 by the way. Of course, is has its own accuracy issues as we all know. When did you go live?

Alex Chudnovsky: Basically we do a lot of research at Majestic. We first launched our index in February of this year, but we only started selling payable information in July. The reason for that is that as we were building different indexes. We were providing quantitative assessment to understand how close we were to Yahoo and Google.

To do this, we picked 20 URLs, some of which were from well-known websites such as Google, Wikipedia, CNN.com, etc. And, we took backlinks from last year that were reported by Google and Yahoo for these URLs.

Every time we made an index, we actually found the backlinks reported by Yahoo and Google in our index. So as we were growing our index, we could see whether we were improving our quality or not. And we found out that we were matching more and more . What it was showing was that our index is actually getting closer to that of Yahoo's and less so to Google's. And I think this is interesting because I don't think our competition is doing something like this, at least not publicly.

Eric Enge: You are continuing to run your own crawlers?

Alex Chudnovsky: Absolutely, yes.

Eric Enge: Does your client base currently skew towards Europe or other geographies?

Alex Chudnovsky: I would say we get clients from the United States, Canada and a lot from Europe. I would say maybe it's 60% from Europe and 40% from America.

If you look at market size in real terms, it probably should be the other way around really. We are not as strong in the United States as we are in the Europe, but we are gaining more and more customers and definitely growing in North America,

Note that in your interview of Rand Fishkin about Linkscape, you asked Rand a question about the bots that they are making use of, whether they are leveraged and if they do custom crawling for themselves. Rand said, in some cases but not all. At Majestic-12, we have our own crawler and we publish information about our own crawler and we are very open about these things.

We are not asking others to crawl for us. We actually crawl the data ourselves, we have the URLs and we decide what we crawl. It's a hundred percent our effort.

Eric Enge: So you must have a fairly substantial data center in order to be able to do that level of crawling?

Alex Chudnovsky: Because we have a distributed computer network it allows us to offload this complicated task to a lot of computers. So, we do not actually need the data centers you would imagine required to sustain this sort of crawling. That's our commercial advantage that gives us hope that we can reach Google scale in respect of webgraph (backlinks) analysis.

Eric Enge: How do you acquire the access to the computers that are within your network?

Alex Chudnovsky: This is done by people who join our project, the Majestic-12 Distributed Search Engine project. They join it and they will use our software on the computers that they own. We are not actually installing it ourselves. It's one hundred percent volunteer and we have built quite a name in the distributed computing area. There are a number of projects out there, but we are fairly unique in that distributed computing projects would usually are CPU intensive.

Eric Enge: How do you recruit your participants?

Alex Chudnovsky: Well, we have a website, www.majestic12.co.uk, which is our main project site and they sign up there. We have more than 100 regular users who return results to us. In a full day they usually crawl more than 5 terabytes of data and around 200 million URLs. The first people who found us were the people who saw our bot in their log files.

After they saw our bot, they searched and found our web page, read about our project and liked the idea, then they joined it. This is how we started, and after some time we become known among the distributed computing community. We have active people who are also doing other distributed computing projects.

They talk about us and this helps increase the interest in our project, so we have grown to a point where we sustained high number of volunteers who can come to us.

Eric Enge: What's in it for them?

Alex Chudnovsky: Remember, our main objective as a company is to build a search engine which can rival Google in terms of relevance, speed and scale. As a part of this, we also need to understand the web better, this is where backlinks come into play. It's strictly volunteer, we have not paid them anything at the moment. What we do is that we will have a separate company for our partners, which will own 20% of shares in the main commercial company, which also owns Majestic-SEO trading name. I have to stress here that money was not the main motivation for the people who took part in our project.

We don't really want people to come to us specifically for a short-term financial incentive in mind, as this can cause problems. In our case, many people who came naturally were interested in distributed computing in general and our project in particular. They like the project, they like the idea of trying to to create a competitor to Google, and they don't like monopolies.

They found that the administration of the project, the way we work, the direction in which we are trying to move, and the feedback that we give to them is good; so it's worth sticking around. This is really how we retain the people who are taking part in this project.

Eric Enge: How many participants do you have?

Alex Chudnovsky: Today we have more than 100 active participants. However, if you look in terms of computers, we have about 150 machines crawling the Internet and analyzing data from different locations in the world.

Eric Enge: How do you get the service to perform acceptably well?

Alex Chudnovsky: That was very difficult. Let me just tell you what you can do in our index. First, you can search for the exact URL and they give you a quick answer. Or you can search for a domain by typing the domain name. Say you typed google.com, in this case we would have search results showing top URLs from that site with some basic statistics, such as how many referring backlinks are internal or external.

How many referring domains it has is also something we show, but something Yahoo does not. I think our competition wants money to show this information, but we show it for free. A lot of effort was put into design of the index to make sure that it can scale to the number of URLs that Google and Yahoo have.

Eric Enge: You must need some powerful hardware.

Alex Chudnovsky: It does use fairly powerful hardware.

Eric Enge: How many servers do you have that are involved in this process?

Alex Chudnovsky: One part is the crawling and analysis stuff, which is done by distributed crawler. That is around 150 machines. Now not all of these computers run 24/7, but many do and they do big chunk of work. We have a lot of hardware involved; but because of the way we did it, we don't need to have this hardware on the premises.

These computers will do the analyses, the crawl and they will send the data back to the central servers. The servers also do quite a lot of work, but we don't need that many. We have less than 10 servers that do the final processing and searching at the moment.

Eric Enge: Thanks a lot, Alex!

Alex Chudnovsky: Thank you very much, Eric!

Have comments or want to discuss? You can comment on the Alex Chudnovsky interview here. Other Recent Interviews
About the Author

Eric Enge is the President of Stone Temple Consulting. Eric is also a founder in Moving Traffic Incorporated, the publisher of Custom Search Guide, a directory of Google Custom Search Engines, and City Town Info, a site that provides information on 20,000 US Cities and Towns.

Stone Temple Consulting (STC) offers search engine optimization and search engine marketing services, and its web site can be found at: http://www.stonetemple.com.

For more information on Web Marketing Services, contact us at:

Stone Temple Consulting
(508) 485-7751 (phone)
(603) 676-0378 (fax)
info@stonetemple.com

Full Article
Adsense Secrets: Getting More Clicks on Your Ads
More CTR (Click Thru Ratio) means more clicks on your Google Ads. But, is CTR all about position and colors of your ads? No! It's a lot more than that. CTR also depends upon the quality of traffic, relevancy of ads, and even the subject of your website. Let's get in detail:

Do you own a High CTR website?

Yes! CTR varies from Industry to industry too. It depends upon the keywords you are using to make your web page. It has been observed that more technical the topic is (but not necessarily) less CTR it will give you (for example Search Engine Optimization, Affiliate Network - exceptions are always there), but still works if the Ad content is well written.

However, this is only one condition; there are many undiscovered conditions that affect the CTR of keywords. At times, a particular season also has an effect on the performance of keywords. For example family of 'Turkey recipe' keyword is more active around November and December only and a quite sluggish rest of the year. It becomes really necessary to study the behavior of keywords before starting a massive website of Adsense around a topic.

Your Ad Position and Color: Old, but very effective

Google heat map helps improve the CTR (Clicks Thru Ratio) of your website by suggesting you the most converting areas for your Adsense Ads. You can have a glance at the Google's Survey that illustrates the ideal placements of ads on your web page.
https://www.google.com/support/adsense
/bin/static.py?page=tips.html#17954


Darker the area, better will be the performance of your ads. Your visitor tends to click on these darker areas more often than the other areas of the web page. Ads placed near rich content usually do well because users are focused on those areas of your web page. For example, on pages where users are typically focused on reading an article, ads placed directly below the concluding part of high quality content tend to perform well, as the visitors are left with no other choice except clicking the Ad block.

Get Targeted Traffic - The Most Essential Part

Traffic that is interested in your content (also called targeted traffic) is interested in your ads too. Thus, there is every likelihood that your ads will be clicked more frequently. Targeted traffic means more CTR, more earnings, and enhanced ad convertibility. On the other hand, the untargeted visitors are not interested either in your content or your ads, so keep your website's traffic targeted.

You can gather highly targeted traffic for your website by web promotion strategy and effective optimization of your web page structure. Effective web promotion strategy requires an appropriate Anchor text and more back links from relevant websites. And, to develop an effective web page structure, you have to optimize your Title Text, internal linking of your website, and most importantly your web content, in the best possible manner.

Choose the Right Anchor Text for Back Link Campaigns

Choosing the right anchor text for back links promotes your website to the traffic you exactly need from the search engines. Choose the Anchor text that directly speaks to your visitors and pulls the traffic that your web page requires. Targeted traffic results in increased CTR of ads. It helps promote your website to that segment of traffic, which is precisely searching for your content (or you can say the traffic that is most profitable to you). Targeting irrelevant keyword reduces your CTR by gathering the traffic which is not interested in your content or ads.

Wisely Choose the Title Text of Your Web Page

Title text of your webpage appears in the SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages) as the Title link to your web page. Therefore, it is the title Text that directly speaks to the surfer on SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages) about your content's theme. It acts like a Free Advertisement Link to your website. If your title text does not interest the surfer, you lose considerable amount of much-needed traffic. Figure out a Title text that directly communicates with your potential visitors, brings targeted traffic, and enhances the CTR of your AdSense Ads. Don't overdo your title text, and use less than ten keywords in your title text.

Help Google Detect the Theme of Your Web Page

There are many on-page and off-page elements that affect your ad relevancy. Better targeted ads increase both your CTR and EPC. Here is how to optimize your ads:

Meta Tags

If there is NO CONTENT on your web page, the Google Mediabot will consider the Meta Tags while displaying ads. Meta tags have a considerable affect on the relevancy of your ads. It is advised never to leave this space empty. Also, try to make it as easy as possible for Mediabot to understand the theme of your web page.

Title Text

Google Mediabot gives good weightage to the keywords used in the Title text, which in turn gets reflected in your ads. Choose effective keywords for your Title text. Even the order of words in a keyword can affect the ads that are appearing on your web page. So, choose your keywords wisely.

Headings

Google Mediabot gives importance to the Heading text enclosed in

Boost Relevancy Artificially - Use Google's Section Targeting

Now, you can enhance Ad relevancy by using Google's Section targeting. Using this technique you can advise Google mediabot about the areas of your content which should be considered or ignored while matching the Ads with your content.

For more information on the same topic, visit:
https://www.google.com/support/adsense
/bin/answer.py?answer=23168&topic=371

Use Channels for Analyzing Your Ads' Performance

Try to relate your traffic logs with your CTR stats. You will get to know which Traffic source is giving you what CTR. This will help you recognize the traffic segment which is most converting for your website. Channels allow you to analyze your ads' performance, so that you can pin point the changes that your website needs to boost your AdSense income. There are two types of channels available - URL Channels and Custom Channels. You can use the URL channel to track your performance, without modifying your Ad code. Through URL channels, you can analyze the performance of individual page or a group of pages, based on the directory system of your website.

Custom channels can help you measure the performance of different Ad formats presented in your web pages. And, by pasting channel-specific ad code into your pages, you can track CTR, Impressions, number of clicks each individual ad format is generating, and compare its performance with other web pages.

Block Junk Websites and Competitor Websites from Showing Ads

There are many junk websites that might be displaying ads on your website. These websites steal the traffic from your website and recycle it on their own Adsense ad blocks. Recognize such websites and stick them in Adsense Competitive Ad filter. Also, you can block your competitor websites using this competitive filter.

This trick can sometimes double or triple your Adsense income, augment user experience, and makes look your Google ads more genuine. For more information about this tool, visit:
https://www.google.com/support/adsense
/bin/answer.py?answer=21593&ctx=sibling

Full Article
Google, your web site and CSS spam
Hiding content and links in CSS code that is not visible to human web surfers has become popular among webmasters who want to trick search engines. Should use use this for your web site?
Full Article
How Google's latest PageRank update affects your web site
Google has updated the PageRank display in its toolbar again. How does this change affect your web site and your rankings on Google?
Full Article
Google's SandBox and TrustRank filters and your web site
Google's Sandbox and Google's TrustRank are often discussed in webmaster forums. How do these factors influence your web site rankings on Google and what can you do to get out of the sandbox or to get a high TrustRank?
Full Article
Google's new Sitelinks and your web site
Google recently started to include a set of links below some results to pages within the site. These new additional links are called Sitelinks. Read this article to learn how these links might affect your web site.
Full Article
Google, your web site and CSS spam
Hiding content and links in CSS code that is not visible to human web surfers has become popular among webmasters who want to trick search engines. Should use use this for your web site?
Full Article
Google's new Sitelinks and your web site
Google recently started to include a set of links below some results to pages within the site. These new additional links are called Sitelinks. Read this article to learn how these links might affect your web site.
Full Article
Google's SandBox and TrustRank filters and your web site
Google's Sandbox and Google's TrustRank are often discussed in webmaster forums. How do these factors influence your web site rankings on Google and what can you do to get out of the sandbox or to get a high TrustRank?
Full Article
How Google's latest PageRank update affects your web site
Google has updated the PageRank display in its toolbar again. How does this change affect your web site and your rankings on Google?
Full Article
Alternatives to Google Adsense for Webmasters & Web Site Owners
I am a huge fan of Google Adsense and personally I would NOT want to use any other ad publishing network, but maybe you as a site owner would prefer to have more options. That is why I have decided to put this list together for you.
Full Article
Perception Is Everything - See How Google Is Slapping People about Pagerank

This article was written in a simple language so you can learn on how google is manipulating the pagerank. Pay attention.

Recently Google did a major PageRank update where a lot of sites were downgraded. Many experts believe this PageRank update was Google's response to link selling - sites which sell links lost points in their PageRank.

Google measures all web pages on a scale of importance from 0 to 10, which is shown in a small green pixel bar on browsers carrying the Google Toolbar. PageRank is "supposedly" measured by the number of backlinks to your site.

Online democracy in action, a link is a vote for your site. The more votes you have the higher your site is ranked. At least that's how it was supposed to work until a lot of high PR sites started selling links and put a monkey wrench into the whole system.

The latest update may be a smart move on Google's part to curtail this practice; who's going to buy a link from a PR2 or even a PR4 site? Besides this could be more than a warning that your site will go down even further if you continue to sell links.

Now this is more of a cosmetic change in PageRank than a real change in your true rankings in Google. Just because your PR goes down doesn't mean your keyword rankings or traffic from Google also goes down.

I saw some of my sites go up, some stayed the same, but my major site took a big hit - falling from PR6 to PR4. This was more of a devastating blow than I expected mainly for psychological reasons than actual consequences. After years of building the best content you can muster and constantly getting quality one-way links, to see that PageRank drop was very disappointing and hits to the core of your online work.

Google sometimes just slap you at the face without any apparent reason. but lets keep it up.

I have been around for a while so I have experienced many Google Updates - anyone remember the Florida Update? I also keep my ears peeled to discussions of the latest updates in Webmasterworld and Stompernet, and I even read Matt Cutts when I get real nervous... so I knew not to panic just because of the sudden drop in PageRank.

I also knew what most of the SEO experts were saying was true because my major keywords stayed the same and my Google traffic actually went up. But that's little comfort when you're talking about Google; you immediately go into overdrive and try to figure out where you went wrong. What caused the drop - because whether PageRank is meaningless or not, you're still going in the wrong direction.

I saw many of my competitors drop too, but many stayed the same and even a few increased in PageRank. What are they doing right; what am I doing wrong? I don't sell links but does Google think I am selling links was my main concern? I even moved one external link from my main page to another part of my site, just in case Google is mistaking that as a paid link.

Welcome to webmaster's paranoid hell! Well, i believe that every webmaster has becamed paranoid about google one day.

For SEO reasons I have very few external links on my main page. Can't see why Google downgraded my main site. I have been at PR6 for years.

Herein lies my main beef, with Google you never really know where you stand; you are constantly walking on eggshells. No matter how good your content or your site is - one misstep and you could be in the doghouse. All your hard work can be taken away in a heartbeat.

It wouldn't matter so much if it was one of the other two major search engines downgrading your site but this is Google.

Free organic traffic from Google is vital to any online site or business. I would take traffic from Google over any other source of traffic on the web, except for traffic coming from my articles on other sites, and even that traffic probably originated from a search in Google.

Google and Google PageRank have always been important to me - that's one of the reasons a sudden large drop causes so much concern. There's another important reason Google PageRank is important to me.

Most SEO experts mistakenly believe PageRank is meaningless because Google is not giving us the true ranking of any site or revealing all the backlinks, which is supposedly one of the major factors in how Google ranks sites. While this fact is obviously true, it has caused many to jump to another conclusion.

Because Google is not giving us the real ranking, many webmasters have dismissed PageRank as a vital element in their sites. Don't make the same mistake.

Google PageRank is extremely important if you're doing business on the web. The higher PR you have, the better. But it has nothing to do with keyword rankings or first page SERPs.

What many SEO experts fail to realize (not really their business) is the whole "perceived" value of PageRank.

Google, hate it or love it, has become the most respected company on the web in the eyes of the majority of the web's users. It carries enormous weight and prestige. The "perceived" value of a high PR7 or PR8 is extremely valuable.

We are not talking about link selling; we are talking about how a perspective business partner or customer will treat your site or business.

Say you have two identical sites you want to do business with online and you discover one is a Google PR2 site and the other is a Google PR8 site - which one would you choose to do business with? Honestly?

From first-hand experience, I know any online company or marketer will get more business offers and be offered more partnerships/joint ventures if you have a high Google PR site than a low one. It will make a difference to your bottom line.

PageRank is important. PageRank has meaning. Even if it has little bearing on your SERPs rankings or Google traffic, PageRank can greatly influence the success of your online site or venture. Don't ignore or dismiss PageRank as a meaningless relic that didn't quite work out as Google had planned for it in the first place.

High PageRank will always be valuable.

The day Google gives its own site a PageRank of PR1 or PR2 instead of the current PR10 - that's the day you can dismiss PageRank as truly meaningless.


About the Author

Click here to Start Your Home Based Business

Making Money with Adsense Ready made Website Online

Free Money Making Ebooks

Easy Jobs Online to Make Money Part Time

Article Source: Content for Reprint


Full Article
Web Site Design India, Web Site Designing, India Website Design
Website design and web development company India offers website design,web design services,web designing services, ecommerce web site designings services.
Full Article
Generating Web Site TrafficIntermediate Tips for Making More Profit By Generating Web Site Traffic
This article looks at how by generating more traffic you will be increasing your revenue and profits today and into the future.[...]
Full Article
Advertise Web Site | How to Advertise your Web Site Effectively
Author John Tulley explains: This article looks at web site advertising and how critical it is for an online business to survive
Full Article
Good Web Site Design: How to Make More Profit With Web Site Design
Author John Tulley explains: This article takes a look at some intermediate tips to keep in mind if you are interested in website design and even making a full time career in web site design.
Full Article
You Searched for optimize my web site for google and found 25 results
To Search again please click the search words below.

HOME website marketing web site marketing internet marketing search engine marketing seo marketing search engine alt tags web site optimization web site seo search engine postion web site search position web design marketing seo company search engine optimization company sem company internet SEM web SEM optimize my web site optimizing my web site web site optimizing seo firm sem firm seo position sem postition Google SEO Yahoo SEO Google marketing Google search engine marketing Google search engine optimization optimize my web site for google market my web site for google web site META tags web page marketing web page META tags META tags search engine key words key words optimization key words generator seo key words seo key word generation key word optimizer page ranking web page ranking trade links free back links back links for my web site back links software back links program seo affiliate program seo backlinks buy back links trade back links seo link trading link trading script free back links script internet marketing strategy search engine marketing strategy google site map google sitemap search engine algorithm asp net search engine optimization asp net web marketing asp net internet marketing asp net SEO application web design meta tags asp net programming asp net programmer markeing asp net marketing tools asp net marketing tool asp net SEO plug in SEO with asp net asp net SEO module buy my widgets search engine optimization search engine optimisation affiliate internet marketing free internet marketing tools affiliate marketing internet marketing seo internet marketing service internet marketing solution internet marketing tools internet marketing advertising company internet marketing master ecommerce internet marketing internet marketing seo search internet marketing resell seo affiliates internet marketing and advertising internet marketing plan internet marketing search local internet marketing website affiliate program web affiliate programs affiliate programs webmaster affiliate program join affiliate program internet marketing affiliate program internet affiliate program free affiliate program new affiliate program money affiliate program internet marketing resource web business online marketing business increase web traffic search marketing make money residual income make money on the internet online money making money affiliate software pay per click SEO quality SEO SEO forum Search engine optimization blog seo software free seo software asp net seo software SEO prices RSS seo marketing RSS feeds seo marketing seo support seo and hosting asp net master pages seo search engine meta tags intenet marketing company internet marketing companies website marketing companies website marketing company website marketing secrets website marketing services internet marketing services website marketing tips website marketing plan website marketing ideas internet marketing secrets internet marketing tips internet marketing ideas automated seo automated internet marketing automated search engine optimization automated seo marketing automated seo control panel seo control panel automated seo submissions automated meta tags automated link trade free text links free textlinks internet marketing online internet marketing business internet marketing advertising marketing advertising marketing online marketing software marketing web marketing web internet marketing internet marketing program strategic marketing marketing companies small business marketing marketing promotion marketing and advertising product marketing advertising SEO advertising online business marketing marketing web design seo search engine optimization search engine optimizing search engine optimization marketing search engine optimization service internet search engine optimization search engine optimization services search engine optimization consulting organic search engine optimization site search engine optimization search engine optimization specialist effective search engine optimization search engine optimization seo services internet marketing search engine optimization search engine optimization search engine search engine ranking search engine placement search engine positioning seo service seo services seo search engine website promotion keyword optimization seo expert seo companies search engine optimization keywords
Automated Search Engine Optimization
Link Partners
Download SpiderLoop SEO control panel now
What is SpiderLoop? A quick Reference:

SpiderLoop is an SEO (Search Engine Optimization) Control Panel, that you install on your web site. Once installed it does several things for your web site.

It will:                                Have questions? Need help? call now toll free ( 1.888.273.0833 )

  • CREATE TARGETED ORGANIC SEARCH ENGINE TRAFFIC TO YOUR WEBSITE download now
  • create quality content and articles for your web site that is indexed by search engines.
  • allow you to quickly trade links with other SpiderLoop users creating backlinks.
  • optimize your web site for the search engines by creating and managing your meta tags
  • allow you to purchase one way backlinks
  • It has several plugins available
    • Create and send your own news letter
    • Dynamically generate a sitemap for your site
    • Create and publish Google Base Feeds
    • Create and publish RSS feeds
  • Manage Google Adsense code on your pages
  • Manage banners on your pages.

Some Pages you should visit before leaving this site.

Do you own an SEO company SEM company or hosting company? SEO affiliate program
You may be missing an income stream. SEO companies can reach clients that can not afford your regular service. SEM companies can add value to their pay per click efforts, and asp.net hosting companies can generate a whole new revenue from existing clients with the SEO affiliate program

search engine postion web site search position web design marketing
seo company
About SpiderLoop free trial
Download SpiderLoop
search engine optimization company
sem company



Copyright 2009 -2010 MMK Technologies
Terms of service (use) | Billing Agreement
internet SEM